Toaster: Fair enough.
My first scumpick would have to be Leaf. Quite frankly, his argument against me is shit and it reeks of scum going for a mislynch.
I don't have a solid second pick, but my gut says Tiruin or Book. But my gut almost always says Book, so that doesn't count for much.
Tiruin: I did not choose voteless.
He appeared to be using my supposed choice in roles to make it seem like I was scummy, said that I claimed to be doing something when I made no such claim (I admit when I'm not doing as much as I should be), and he's going after someone who hasn't done much and is therefore a low-risk target. Scum tend to go for lurkers, active or otherwise, when they need an easy mislynch and it seems to me that that's what Leafsnail is doing.
Leafsnail:
You posted quite a few lovely contentless posts about your lack of vote including some posts to prove you had no vote. In other words, looking like you were doing something while in fact just pissing around due to having no vote. In other words, using your votelessness as an excuse for being useless.
I'll ask once more. Where am I
actively using my votelessness as an excuse of any sort? Confirming my votelessness but having no content is very different from citing my votelessness as the reason for my lack of content.
And probably three of those were PFPs. I'm well aware that I didn't do anything useful before the end of the day, I admitted that.
Ok, let's say three of them were PFPs. How about the other three? Why didn't you do anything in spite of
No questions right now, I just found out I was playing and only had a few minutes to post. So I'll get something more substantial out within 24 hours.
Ok, the day ended 22 hours after that post. Shouldn't your next post in day 2 have been bursting with the content that was cruelly cut off by the end of the last day? Rather than another non-post? Heck, you still haven't done anything today except take a couple of lazy swipes at the guy voting you.
First post of the day was PFP with something I noticed about the votecount which actually didn't get answered. After that, I decided to focus on you.
You're only really worth those lazy swipes right now.
Well when you supplement your argument against me by attacking my choice of role (which, as UI pointed out, has nothing to do with my actual alignment) I've gotta question your motives.
It. Affects. Nothing. About. My. Main. Argument. You can either respond to that point or waste more time repeating that irrelevancy.
Your main argument is shit. Satisfied? All you're doing is going after the least-active player. I don't think I've ever seen that win a game.
Pot and kettle pot and kettle pot and kettle. Seriously, you're speaking as someone who's done nothing today except make terrible attempts to discredit the person voting you. In any case, the sentence was a nonsequiter - a weird passive swipe. I will attack people if they do things like that.
Big difference between what you're doing and what I'm doing. What you did was attempt to discredit me because of the way I introduced my observations, not the observations themselves. I'm discrediting your observations, not the way you brought them up. You want to lynch me because I haven't been particularly useful yet, not because I'm scummy.
I have gained a contradiction from Toaster. If I had fired the question first and showed my hand I wouldn't have his own excuse to hit him with now. But please either explain how seeking this contradiction makes me mafia or leave this discussion of strategy until after the game.
A weak contradiction at best. More could have been gained with a question, but this has little to do with scumhunting at this point, so I'll drop it.
PFP