You're going around and around in circles,
Either that or you are, probably because you got the wrong end of the wrong stick about what I was saying, and I'm messing up in trying to resolve the original misunderstanding...
War training will not take place in a cage.
Yes. Which is what I've been saying all along. Heck, I was even backing you up, after you'd said "let the dog out of the cage"...
Your quote even FAILS TO MENTION CAGES IN THE BOTTOM PART WHERE IT IS TALKING ABOUT WAR TRAINING.
It says "Some people were having trouble figuring it out, you need a zone." i.e., not-a-cage. (I already suggested that the sole mention of cages in the bottom half, which I can see that you must have missed while in your ALLCAPS frustration-mode, was doubtless a slip or a reference to something else.)
Like I'd already pointed out (in the original quoting) the break between the tame-training and the job-training part of the explanation. Even put line-feeds in, but it just looked to me as if you'd missed that distinction. My further apologies for being unclear on that point, though.
As for the age of the comment, it was a
recent quote (fairly so, 21/Apr/2012, post 34.06, regarding the changes that we are now (still) seeing). Certainly, a review of the Devnotes indicates no
announced changes to training (that I could see, may have missed something) in amongst all the cart-heavy addition notes and onwards, so I considered that a valid current comment. If I'm wrong about that, I apologise and sincerely withdraw on that point.
Except that he didn't actually say what you think he said in the first place.
Well, that's always a possibility, except that I can't see where (except with the noted "[? ? ?]"-marked bit that I was suggesting was a slip of the tongue or a conflation of the various processes) he actually contradicts what I'm pretty sure
you're saying. It supports what you were saying. Already backing you up on the "let the dog out of the cage" point, the quote was there to cement the facts you'd laid down.
But 'nuff said. Leastwise, on my part. I shall take with good grace any further critique on my communication skills and try to be more careful next time. (Although there are no guarantees to that effect, I'm afraid. I know how I am, you see... Too many commas, and more problems besides.)