Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Discussion of Literature  (Read 742 times)

AustralianWinter

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Discussion of Literature
« on: June 04, 2012, 06:05:14 am »

So, I finished reading Paul Auster's "Oracle Night" yesterday, and I'm still reflecting on it. Specifically
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Today, I started reading Dostoyevsky's "Crime and Punishment". Do any of you have any experience reading him? I read a good part of "Notes from the Underground", but never got around to finishing it.

Any suggestions for books are also very welcome. Being Scandinavian, I sometimes feel a bit estranged from World Literature.
Logged
And the Lord said unto John, "Come forth and receive eternal life." But John came fifth and won a toaster.

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile
Re: Discussion of Literature
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2012, 08:20:29 am »

IMO Raskolnikov's problem is that he is a wuss, and the cop is full of manure
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.

Lord Dullard

  • Bay Watcher
  • Indubitably.
    • View Profile
    • Cult: Awakening of the Old Ones
Re: Discussion of Literature
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2012, 08:54:15 am »

Crime and Punishment is really heavily philosophical. Great book, but it's more of a thought-provoking read than something you'd want to read at a leisurely or recreational pace. Raskolnikov is representative of somebody who tried to become the 'uberman', but in attempting to validate this by overstepping the bounds of society's legal constraints and morality, he finds that he is just as subject to these things as anybody else (especially the morality part).
Logged

RedKing

  • Bay Watcher
  • hoo hoo motherfucker
    • View Profile
Re: Discussion of Literature
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2012, 07:53:07 am »

What ChairmanPoo said. Crime and Punishment was the most frustrating thing I've ever read, and I just wanted to beat the shit out of Raskolnikov.

If you want a novel about a waffling, indecisive Russian that is much MUCH better, then read Goncharov's Oblomov.

EDIT: Actually, Oblomov is worth reading in its own right, if only because most of us can recognize at least some of him in each of us. He's the quintessential slacker, and most of the story is about how he comes up with great things he wants to do, and then promptly comes up with excuses why he should just stay in bed instead. He's even too slack-ass to properly pursue the woman who is interested in him despite his problems.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2012, 09:16:47 am by RedKing »
Logged

Remember, knowledge is power. The power to make other people feel stupid.
Quote from: Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Science is like an inoculation against charlatans who would have you believe whatever it is they tell you.

fqllve

  • Bay Watcher
  • (grammar) anarcho-communist
    • View Profile
    • ufowitch
Re: Discussion of Literature
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2012, 08:30:36 am »

And if you want a novel by Dostoevsky that is better, try just about anything else he wrote, particularly The Brothers Karamazov.

Notes from the Underground is excellent though. I'm undecided whether or not I prefer the first or the second part. The first part is hilarious (although sometimes I get the feeling that Dostoevsky is making fun of me personally) but the second part is so pathetic that it makes the first part even more hilarious. Actually, the Underground Man and Raskolnikov have a lot in common, Raskolnikov just isn't presented so satirically, presumably because Dostoevsky was older and found the misanthropic intellectual to be more serious a problem.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2012, 08:32:26 am by fqllve »
Logged
You don't use freedom Penguin. First you demand it, then you have it.
No using. That's not what freedom is for.