TheodolusHooray, I messed up the word 'everyone' when I was thinking all the ICs. Mistake for rushing a post before going to work. Apologies.
I don't think those FoS's are to provoke from where I'm seeing it, as you [Deathsword] suspect...more than 2 people
and choose not to answer any questions coming from them [me, actually]. I'm wondering why you're [Theo] jumping in with Shakerag to say the same to me when he hasn't answered why he is saying so, though. Did you even read my reasons on why I voted him, or even wait on why Shakerag said so? I'm not scum, nor is Deathsword my buddy but the only way I can prove it is by my words.
Where did you see shock there?
But as you brought it up, to humor
Deathysword:
Tiruin: You've been repeatedly acting very friendly towards me, as Shakerag has pointed out (more on that below). What are you trying to gain by trying to buddy with the guy with the most votes? Draw suspicion towards me? Because you are doing a fabulous job at that.
I'm not trying to gain anything, as I'm not even buddying you. If you see me buddying, then state
how and not give a null signal. If I was drawing suspicion towards you, then I guess it is very evident in my post, along with that nice red text that had your name on it. However, you say this like I've been...oh, repeating it? Wow. You're 'more on that below' just cut off your line of thought, and if I have to restate: You have evaded my questions.
And to complete it.
Tiruin: Yes, it was quite stupid of me not to heed the IC advice and not pressure BMC more, but there's nothing anyone can do about that now.
The pressure vote on Abcullater was simply to try and get anything out of him, as he said pretty much nothing. The night question was a bad question, and didn't help at all. But I am a terribly unimaginative person and as such these things end up being said.
No, there is. Heeding their advice,
now.If you wanted to get
anything out of him, why ask something that happened
in the night of all things; you say it is a bad question and it didn't help at all and yet continued to ask it?
By terribly unimaginative, you mean really can't find anything to ask people to see if they're scum or not?
I didn't say anything about a "full assault"; my implication was more akin to a few stray shots zipping by overhead. I offered a more extensive explanation of my reasoning and thought process because my responses were being largely ignored when I responded with the bare minimum or with nothing but the end of my train of thought. Any reason why you're cherrypicking the least-relevant portions of my posts and misinterpreting metaphorical statements instead of scumhunting?[/i]
You didn't say anything about it, yes, but your post sounded like a full assault with that confession and that 'I don't care' notion. I don't see anything as 'least relevant', or it wouldn't be put in there, would it? Though, you sound sincere in your words there and seem determined to see CA lynched in that case.
Could you clarify by what metaphorical statements I am misinterpreting?
I picked that paragraph out of those statements because of the bolded part now shown.
In any case, if being honest and open about my thoughts and intentions is going to draw fire, I don't particularly care. I'd rather provide as much reasoning as I can, both as a learning tool and to help town, even if I take flak from scum looking for a mislynch. I screwed up and didn't look around as much as I should have during D1, and if I'm the only one willing to admit that, so be it.
You state that you didn't look around as much as you should have in D1, yet your first reason for
voting him still sounds like it stands, but now you bring out the point in which it is true. CA did lack in scumhunting his target, though whether for reasons in RL/lack of internet affecting it, I cannot see.
Though, I think I see where CA slipped, in terms of reasoning.
Chaos ArmorYour question to Flying Dice was as such:
How does one start a bandwagon, Flying Dice? I can certainly see how one joins one. My reasons for voting you Flying Dice are as follows: You voted me for nonsensical reasons then took it off to avoid looking like you were attacking me. You jumped on a bandwagon D1 looking for an easy lynch. And so far your voting style looks like you're just following the crowd and trying to get someone lynched.
I question how you find a two-player vote on you, a bandwagon. Technically, as of latest votecount, you aren't the one on the lynching board in the sense of a bandwagon.
I don't think nonsensical was what he was seeing it as, pre-correction. Could you explain why Flying Dice jumped on a bandwagon? Post here seems panicking because of another vote.
Based on that last sentence [as FD's vote was focused on you], I can guess you're also saying that the crowd is trying to lynch...you? What statements made you think FD is following the crowd?
PPE
ShakeragTiruin: Why do I mention you in my post to Deathsword? Because of this timeline:
-D2 Starts
-Ds votes CA, suspects abc but says abc hasn't done anything scummy
-Tiruin votes abc (which, if I was scum, would be my #1 mislynch pick for D2)
-Tiruin pokes Ds to question abc
-Ds can't think of questions for abc, FoSes abc, then copies your question to abc
-Tiruin totally softballs Ds on the abc topic
-Ds now votes abc (again, ripe mislynch target) with a question I said not to ask
Note that this entire time abculatter_2 never made a post.
So Deathsword starts off D2 voting the wrong guy, Tiruin pops in scumchat and tells Deathsword to vote the easy lynch guy (abc), and Deathsword bumblefucks his way over to voting him.
I don't understand what exactly you're asking about the "inertiawagon thing". (As an aside, was this term thrown around before this game? I don't really remember seeing it before, but I kind of like it anyway.)
Um. What?
That is my first reaction upon reading this.
My first post of the day did poke the question, however it was because of the first sentence of his post. He suspected abc, but then states that he didn't do anything he considers scummy. Which I guess means: "Mostly avoiding questions or giving very vague answers." by his
post. And, it isn't noted that he can't specifically think questions for abc, but for general scumhunting ascertained in the same post.
Basically, I see this all as a huge non sequitur. It doesn't match up, and you're working on a total implication on...that. That bolded post. Where in the world are you getting that kind of reasoning?
I'm not sure what you're also getting at by calling my note on him softballing, but I guess you're right there (if by softballing you mean by just stating something). That statement was typed in the intention of getting a reply, because it states the lack of the essence of this game - scumhunting, of which I received no reply whatsoever on that because I failed to turn it into an obvious question.
I'm asking on the inertia wagon because this is the only time I've seen the term.
Also, scum have an IC to point stuff out, and putting in the notion if you're with them
and making a half-hearted reason such as this, I feel something is wrong with you. Why do you think abc was an easylynch when it was obvious that he didn't reply at all?
How does what you say make me scum, and with Deathsword, by your following inference?