I think misandry is not the problem. The problem is that men never had a unified intellectual movement to reexamine the male gender, unlike, say, feminism.
Even if feminism seems weaker today than in the 1970's-1980's, the ideas are pretty ingrained--e.g. few intelligent women would seriously take gender advice from a Cosmo, or define themselves only through their sexual partners, or through how they fulfill traditional gender roles (e.g. for women: household and family and appearance).
On the other hand, intelligent men and women see masculinity as some sort of given--and so listen to all the masculinity vendors out there--guys actually read Maxim for tips on how to be real men, define themselves by how much money they make or how many girls they've slept with and how much they can bench press or binge drink.
Men aren't alone in promoting repressive gender roles, women do so as well (I recall a recent conversation with a female friend where she stated how she only likes assertive men--I countered with whether or not it would be ok for a men to only like submissive women--granted assertive seems like a better deal than submissive, but it is still a traditional dichotomy and it is still repressive--men should have the right to be passive and still be masculine, just as women have the right to be assertive and still be feminine). In a sense, if in feminism the discussion that the term "bitch" designates women who overstep gender bonds by being assertive has long been held, amongst men a similar discussion about unassertive men is not, and has not been held--I'm sure we all have male friends who have trouble dating or adjusting because they are shy or quiet, or sensitive. A good degree of their maladjustment, is that our present gender definitions leave those kind of men outside the norm, class them into marginal territory, mark them as failures to their gender, and this is wrong.
Feminist critics pointed out that traditional gender roles reduced women to glorified servants, baby-makers and eye-candy, and the vast majority of women (and men) in the west took heed, it was a generational discussion.
On the other hand, there has never been a generational discussion that pointed out that traditional gender roles for men reduce them to ill-developed neanderthals, somehow inherently violent, unfeeling and insensitive and unintelligent compared to women.
Men's gender options and choices are now significantly more restrained than a woman's--and it is not legal and institutional society doing it, but other men; social peers. E.g. Women can wear men's clothes and it can mean a fashion statement or a game or a provocation or an actual statement of sexual identity. The structure of what makes the feminine feminine is no longer shaken by a woman wearing pants, or even a woman with a necktie.
On the other hand, If a man wears a woman's clothes he is only, and definitively declaring a sexual identity--no room for play or variation here--unless its obviously meant as a joke--e.g. balloon breasts and a dress--in which case it only reaffirms (an imaginary) stable male identity. If I wore a skirt instead of jeans even my most liberal friends would raise an eyebrow-- a man simply can't opt out of masculine norms. Masculinity, it turns out, is shaken by damn well near everything. It is as if women's gender roles evolved, whereas men's dumbed down.
This is not sexism towards men, this is men failing to reexamine what makes masculinity masculinity--which are actual values to endorse and what is just oppressive bullshit. Failing to reexmine--but still forcing the unexamined gender roles on their peers (e.g. a recent article suggest that teenage boys read less than their female peers because they feel that reading is feminine (mothers read to children, fathers play ball with them), imagine how that plays out in a middle school context with boys who like reading)
We need a new term for feminism, the old one seems to alienate men and make the movement solely about women, rather than about equality and liberation from repressive norms.
Perhaps if we men understood feminism as a movement to liberate us all (men and women) from the rigidity of traditional gender, rather than women's rights only, misandry and misogyny would fade to the back-shelves of history.