[So you all opted for an extension. Let's see you use it.]
You claim he's one of your prime suspects when you haven't been questioning him at all.
Yeah, I guess I haven't.
Way to follow through here. You're not exactly making me feel like what Urist is saying about you is off the mark.
And now the problem we have 2 votes on two guys. hmm. So if who we lynch turn scum we know who to target next no, otherwise we lose yes?
Unvote, Vote Urist
What the hell is this crap? Where are your reas...
ok now that we have a small chance of not losing, as opposed to none I can try to explain.
... okay.
IMHO the scummiest players of the game would be Obolisk and Shakerag, but I do not have the time to make a case to send 3 votes their way sadly.
... wait, what? Where in the hell is this coming from now? With everything that's been going back and forth this last day of the game, you're putting me and obolisk as scummier than Urist or Supercharazad? Luckily for you there's an extension, so I'd love to hear your reasoning.
Having looked over Super's posts he in all instances seems to be honestly scumhunting, overall unless he is secretly Toaster, that is a supervillian mastermind, or something I sincerely doubt he is scum.
And what Urist pointed out about Supercharazad is irrelevant ... how?
Now honestly given a choice i would rather vote Shakerag than Urist, but that is not an option at this point.
All of my WTF. Is my head screwed on correctly? Because I don't remember hearing anything about this before now.
To add to it, Urist has been pressuring a motion, and while this might be seen as a town tell in that he desired someone to be lynched before we lose, the fact that I am the deciding vote and that super has been poking me post of the Day leads me to suspect he expected my to vote super. <- all hypothesis.
I am interested in learning who the scum were.
"A motion"? Also, it took me a while to parse what you were saying here. I think I see what you were getting at, but the reasoning feels weak to me. Wouldn't Super/obolisk be expecting you to vote Urist?
Sorry for so many posts, finally got done reading through.
Super, #1 rule to mafia. Town do/should not lie. it will in most all situations lead too a bad outcome for town if you are town / a good outcome for scum. e.g. it is a scummy move.
So how does Scum IC work anyways? I'm assuming they have some sort of mentor?
[This is good and all, but just because you feel you've found scum doesn't mean you're off the hook for the day. There are two scum left, so assuming scum is lynched today, the game will go on, and the other scum needs to be found as well.]
[Also, I'm not sure what you're asking about scum IC. In a beginner's game, there are two scum, and a non-playing IC is assigned to coach the scumteam in the scumchat.]
You can't suspect a non-player.
[Hush, you. I think he was joking, anyway.]
I'll re-read everything, and then make up my mind about Urist vs Super.
I'm not necessarily certain this is the case, but saying this without addressing Urist's last post to you comes across to me as "Oh shit, I need to bus my scumbuddy and distance myself while doing so." I had you pegged as town for most of the game in my head, but now I'm wondering if you're getting the LYLO jitters.
PPE:
Unvote, Vote Jiokuy
[I can't even fathom what you're about here. Voting one's self is nearly universially seen as scummy, and there is especially no reason to do so in a beginner's game.]
Author
Topic: Beginner's Mafia XXXIII: u no can has ch33zburgers (9/9) (Read 55323 times)