Jiokuy, you've been online very recently, but you haven't posted for two days. I see two possibilities here:
1. You are lazy town. Just because things look bad doesn't mean you should give up. Get back in here and dig for scum. You won't save yourself by giving up (and frankly, you shouldn't care about being lynched if you're town), but you might if you start being aggressive and scumhunting. If you're town and not protesting or trying to stop a mislynch, you're hurting town. If you're town and you're giving up or lurking instead of scumhunting, you're hurting town.
2. You are scum, and have either given up at the prospect of an imminent lynch or are attempting to redirect attention by acting like lazy town.
I'm also curious about why you voted to "keep the conflict balanced"? That sounds like you don't care who gets lynched, which would suggest that either you're scum and both Hapah and borno are town and you're trying to fit into the "sideliner" category where you're active enough to smell like town but not active enough to be in the spotlight, or that you are (as above) lazy town.
I'm not positive which it is, but rest assured that if you do not respond, I
will be voting for you, not least because your last few posts feel like what I've seen of Org's scumplay back in old 2009 games, albiet somewhat less polished.
Hapah, I only found it to be mildly suspicious when you answered Urist as if you were scum in this game, rather than hypothetically. That could very well be a newbtell, though, so I was going to put it aside if nothing else caught my eye.
However.
And nobody asked, but I don't really like the RVS in general. You do have to get the conversation moving, sure, but I wish people were a little tighter with their votes.
Why don't you like RVS votes? Are you uncomfortable with people putting pressure on you that early in the game? I understand that it could be tricky to hide your scumminess with little prior experience, so I can see how you wouldn't like having to deal with that sort of attention. RVS is one of the better ways for D1 town to start digging up enough reason for a focused scumhunt.
Furthermore, you went after borno for an insignificant change to his question for you, one which clarified it. That suggests to me that you're looking for an excuse to start a bandwagon without any real reason. Care to explain why town would want to bandwagon someone not because of evidence or even a gut feeling, but because they were trying to make things less complex? Complexity and confusion are tools of the informed minority, after all.
What really got my attention was your response back in your first active post.
Hapah: It's N1, and you're a scum roleblocker. No one claimed a role during D1. How do you pick your target?
Look for the nervous one. You know the type: Posts 4 times in 30 minutes after getting one hard question and a RVS vote. New players get weighted a little easier (they're twitchy all the time), but I'd guess anyone that jumps when you say "Boo" probably does so for a reason.
So someone who responds once, with a brief post, is preferable to someone who posts multiple responses in a short period of time? More posts are always better because they let us get a better read on people, even if we're relatively new and don't have metaknowledge of playstyles. The more someone posts, the higher the chance that they'll drop a scumtell. I'll agree that people who freak out because they're targeted would be something to notice in a veteran game, but in BM it is basically a nulltell because people aren't used to being pressured like this. Quite apart from that, someone who is posting a lot, even if only in their own defense, is at least helping to keep the game active, which is always good for town.
@Hapah: It's D2. You are scum. There is a player aggressively attacking other players, and there is a lurker who has only posted twice in the actual game. Who do you kill?
Neither. They can both be useful, in their own way. The player aggressively attacking anything that moves muddies the waters, and as far as I'm concerned he's doing the Scum a favor. A lurker isn't hunting scum, and it's REAL hard to find them if not you're looking. As an added bonus, he'll look a little scummy because he's lurking: He might not be a hard lynch later in the game. If I had to choose one, though, I guess I'd NK the lurker.
So someone who is aggressively scumhunting and pressuring people is bad for town? You've implied and stating this several times now. One time I would probably file as a newbtell. Maybe twice. But three times, you've said that aggressive scumhunting is bad. That reeks of newscum trying to get town to be more passive to me. You also implied that it is preferential for scum to NK lurkers. Scum who NK lurkers are generally scum who are scared; this suggests that you're trying to subtly convey the notion that lurkers are therefore probably town. What this says to me is that you're trying to talk people into going after aggressive scumhunters (who help town and hurt scum) rather than pressuring lurkers into activity, which can only help town.
You reek of scum to me.