Hapah:I was happy with the Scroll, but I was really hoping for anything I could target so I could point it at you, Book. I'd either trip your Self-Defense and negate the NK, or it wouldn't go off and I could call you for putting a lie (no SD scroll) on a lie (protecting me that night).
Heh, didn't think of that either. I tell you, that was pretty cunning, and I guess I got lucky you had nothing with which to target me. Those are pretty common.
(see Book setting me straight after he joins. That was this game, right?)
Yes. For clarity and reference, most of the game-related stuff I said was honest advice; while I lied a lot (being scum), I did mean it that D1 no-lynches are almost always bad for town, that opposing an extension on LYLO is both bad for town and scummy, that you don't
need a justification for a FoS beyond "my gut says you're acting funny", that claiming 100% certainties is wrong and misguided because, yes,
everybody fucking lies, even townies, and everybody has something to hide (details on their role, or masonchats, or whathaveyou).
While "lynch all liars" is a common (and sort of valid) position to take, and townies run the risk of causing a mislynch by lying if discovered, one should never assume claims are valid, or that all possible combinations & permutations are accounted for. Especially if there are dead players who can no longer be questioned - trusting the dead just because they flipped town can make for dangerous assumptions.
I just couldn't shake the feeling that Urist-Jack could be a team. What does everyone else think? I thought it was an unfortunate but reasonable mislynch.
Well, I'm obviously biased, but I think that while the assumptions that led to it were reasonable, you should have paid more attention to who was
scummy rather than who made the statistics work. But Jack was reasonably scummy.
I haven't even cracked open scum or dead chat. I think I'll do that tonight!
Oh, you should. Lots of pearls there, in both chats. I'm sure you'll enjoy them.