That was... weird. OK, Jack posted, so let's look at that first:
FoS crap
You are full of shit and doubling down on your shitty response. I explained my reasoning several times, and you continue your scummy panicky reaction to a FoS. This tells me you are scum. But I'm done with this topic. People can reread the relevant posts themselves and form their own opinion.
You didn't respond for quite some time (you were "unexpectedly away" for a day, according to you), [...] I was in no situation in which I could post, or even read the game. Simple as that.
So, when I'm busy it's a suspicious "according to me" thing, but when you are busy it's "simple as that"... double standard much? Some times people are busy, and we all post when we can. But your attempt to latch onto my busyness as sinister and yours as innocent is again a scummy tactic to pile new bullshit on top of your other bullshit.
[about UI's inventory claim demand]Why demand it: Standard reasoning for it, as far as I can tell, is to maximize information available to the town. That's pretty much the main reason for demanding it.
For demanding
past actions, yes. Not for future ones; that only helps the scum, and we can see that most everybody saw that and lied about it anyway. His request was anti-town. Your failure to denounce it, and claiming it favours town, is scummy on its own merits, and one more instance of you and UI agreeing more than two random townies would.
it's still a good move for scum paladin to claim non-paladin when inspected.
Right. Since he claimed non-paladin when inspected, he's scum? But you think he's telling the truth? Bah.
It's confirmed LYLO now.
Confirmed? It's only confirmed LYLO if there are two scum left, yes? Since you seem sure it is confirmed, it means you know how many scum remain. How do you know this?
Complaints about people not answering questions:
*Bookthras: Answer the question at the end of my block on you in this post, please.
For week-old stuff in the middle of a wall-of-text, quoting it would be easier, yes? But I think you mean this:
Experience tells me that with ten players, three scum and a 3rd party is too much, so it makes sense there are only two actual mafia, but then for balance I think there is still a 3rd party out there. For starters, a brother is not a particularly powerful 3rd-party role, so for balance there should be at least one more (6-2-1-1 is a safe bet). We know it's not a killer, as all kills/attempts have been accounted for. It may be something rather innocuous like a second brother or survivor, or something more sinister like a cult. We should not ignore this possibility.
Bookthras: What exactly made you change your opinion on this?
Well, a 6-2-1-1 situation seems likely as I originally suggested, but I changed my level of certainty about it after Hapah reminded me about Roguelike3's two mafia teams, and I dropped the cult idea once it became clear by conversation that either there wasn't one or they had already won.
If you meant a different question, please quote it.
On a completely different topic, Ottawa's a great-looking city.
Yes, it is. That river is a beautiful thing, isn't it? You should see it in winter.
You'll figure it out when I flip.
I really hate this. So you're
voting yourself? that's nuts, regardless of alignment. It may be a self-bus to aid Jack, or a bluff to get people into a chaotic vote-swapping as the day comes to an end, or there may be something unexpected about his flip (can he be a jester? it's not impossible, but he hasn't played a jestery game). All in all a confusing move.
But this tied vote resolves nothing. I still think scum is either you or Jack, and maybe both, so if you want to die, I have no problem helping you.
Vote Imiknorris.