Zombie:
Because Flandre is not Think. While they share a role, there could be any number of reasons as to why Think was acting scummy before he asked for a replacement(including the possibility that he was scum). Whatever it was, it was enough for him to ask for a replacement. Thus, Flandre shouldn't be judged by Think's actions, but by her own.
Wait Think was scummy, so he asked for a replace? Why are you trying to justify Think's scumminess now? Although there may be other reasons for Think's scumminess, the most likely one is that he is scum. Either way, Flandre's actions are scummy, so my vote stays on her.
...Derp. I worded that terribly. That post without the middle line of "Whatever it was...replacement" is what I meant. I have no idea why I posted that. I'm not trying to justify Think being scummy; I'm trying to tell you that Think could have looked scummy for reasons other than being scum, and that Flandre may not have those reasons. Essentially, judge Flandre by her actions, not Think's.
Flandre:
The first thing that I would like to say is that Zombie Urist is likely town; the argument he set up against me last night was designed to bear more weight after his flip. He really does believe that I am scum.
I don't see your logic. Could you elaborate?
Shake:
Orangebottle: Do you still feel that ZU is scum?
I think it's just as likely that
Zombie Urist is scum. What's even more likely now, however, is that
ToonyMan is scum.
Toony:
Okay so I get back early (by chance) and not even a tie-breaker vote? For shame. I'm will vote Tiruin because I don't like the people voting zombie urist and I think he's getting scapegoated. This was a somewhat difficult choice but out of the two I think I'm making the better decision here.
Please, explain how Zombie Urist was being scapegoated.
I'm actually shocked Toaster was killed and not one of the lynchers, I feel so bad for you Toaster what did you even do this time.
'The lynchers'?
That being Darvi, Flandre, and myself lynching Tiruin. Maybe I should have made this more obvious, my bad.
"Oh my god, who could've guessed that Toaster was gonna be killed? Look, Town, I'm acting shocked that your vigilante is dead, because obviously one of the lynchers would've died because the scum is known for it's predictability."
The fuck?
Toony, why all of this speculation about why scum killed who?
This is pretty stupid. I'm actually surprised by this. Isn't it better to well, figure out who scum are? I mean by how Day 1 went we can infer who are more likely scum by how they interacted with Tiruin. Unless you know something we don't know etc etc
That doesn't really answer the question at all. Not even a bit.
"Why are you speculating about the nightkill?"
"Because we can look at how people interacted with Tiruin to find the scum!"
Am I the only one seeing the logic break here?
Gonna stop LURKING IronyOwl?? Share some thoughts man!
And Jokerman's last post was April 13th, an entire week ago.
Why are you only going after the lurkers?
So you're excusing your buddying with wine that can be caused by an early bus?
No no no, I will simply not accept this. That's so fucking stupid. Do you remember how the day ended? I got back from classes 30 minutes beforehand and it was still a tie. I broke the tie by voting Tiruin, who was scum, there's no way in hell I would ever do that as scum. I would shoot myself.
I can think of at least one situation in which scum would break a tie between two other scum. Also,
this book now belongs to you.
In sum:
-Gloating
-Wine
-Fake-answer
-Lynch All Lurkers
Yeah, there's no way you aren't scum.
Author
Topic: Supernatural 5 - Ended (Read 103604 times)