Now I'm getting nervous about the resurrections. That'd make three priests, unless
Darvi's a lying liar who took credit for Shak's rez. What do you think of that, Darvi?
Anyway, because I've already written it, here's the ZU part of the post I tried to get in before the deadline but failed to:
Zombie Urist:Fuckit. Urist Imiknorris is a survivor type. I didn't want to say earlier since he was up for replacement.
Ah. That makes sense, I suppose.
Right. So because werewolves were straight killers in one previous game, they are clearly and obviously killers in this one. Because vampires were a cult in one previous game, they are clearly and obviously a cult in this one. And because you'd consider it "unbalanced," having two vigs is possible but not true.
Why so certain?
This has been the case in past games and I don't think the nature of scum teams have changed since.
With a sample size of, what, two each? I'm pretty sure doomsday cult was the scumteam one time, so you're probably talking about a lone instance in at least one case and twice for the other. That's hardly conclusive enough to say that vampires are and always will be a cult.
They formed a picture of two guys fighting, which meant you were a killer. Why are you so concerned over flavor?
Because it can be harder to fake than straight results.
I've said earlier, I doubt the existence of two vigs enough to be confident you are part of the scumteam.
So you're so confident of your knowledge of role distribution that you don't feel the need to scumhunt?
Which still doesn't explain why you're trying to intercept somebody who's trying to figure out whether they think differently. Why do you care if Dariush faffs around asking something with an obvious answer? You haven't cared about him before.
I'm confused by this part? Dariush doesn't look like he thinks the answer is obvious.
But you do, so why so concerned about him faffing about over it? And if you were, why drag it out with a rhetorical question instead of just explaining it to him?
Why would there be more than 1 kill?
Because if IO is a killer (or rather since, since I see no way for him not to be one), he hadn't killed anyone for two nights straight.
I think he's a killer on the scumteam.
And you think this strongly enough, despite having done zero scumhunting on me, to be willing to dismiss discussion of it. Does that sound very townlike to you?
Most of the remainder is still relevant, so it goes out in the open.
Powder Miner:Toaster:
Yeah, that theory is dumb. I had meant to say survivor and then I went "Oh crap I said SK and I can't edit my post" and I tried to cover it over. I had meant to say survivor though.
You're concerned enough about your image that you'd lie to us about your theories to avoid looking like you made a mistake?
I think vampires are hostile because traditionally they are and I can't think of a reason why a medievally flavored mafia like this would have pretty boy vampires that just want to get along.
"Hostile" and "pretty boy" are not the only options. Many, many vampires in innumerable sources are neither especially friendly towards humans nor bloodthirsty murdering lunatics. The notion that he's a vampire who just wants to feed on the living, without needing to kill them assuming there's enough to go around, does not seem strange in the slightest to me.
Also, yeah, I said vampire buddies. I said the word buddies. Doesn't mean I said he's mafia, cause I didn't. I said that hs teammates brought him back from the dead? Guess what? There could be a cult leader who could bring someone back from the dead.
So you think there's a cult
and a traditional scumteam of killers, or do you not consider a cult to qualify as "mafia?"
You still haven't explained your massive jump from traditionalist ("Vampires are bad") to speculative ("Necrocult did it") viewpoints. I'd very much like an explanation of that.
Also, addendum as of today: Why didn't you vote to extend?
Author
Topic: Supernatural 5 - Ended (Read 103037 times)