Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Nadaka]

And a bad night for slippery slopes. People will be petitioning to marry their pets before you know it, mark my words.

anndddd who cares? As far as I'm concerned people can marry a rock if they feel like it.

Is it a rock that is capable of providing written consent while signing a marriage license without duress? Ok.

But there is nothing even remotely similar between allowing "the gays" to suffer through marriage like the rest of us, and allowing marriage to inanimate or non sapient objects/food items.

[darkrider2]

In the immortal words of Jimmy McMillan ~ You wanna marry a shoe, I'll marry ya.

[GlyphGryph]

Honestly, the only sort of slippery slope I see is for 3+ person marriages, and that's honestly a ways down the road as far as public support, technically difficult, and not actually a bad thing.

So a big ol' *shrug*

[Leafsnail]

Changing the number of people clearly requires legal changes to allow it to make sense.  Changing the gender of a participant doesn't.

[GlyphGryph]

But you have to admit that requiring people of the same gender to be able to marry is an needed step for marriages involved more than one person.

So it's a slope... but it's honestly not that slippery, with all those road blocks and brambles and technical legal debris in the way.

[MetalSlimeHunt]

The only problem with legalizing polygamous marriage is logistical, not moral.

[kaijyuu]

And a bad night for slippery slopes. People will be petitioning to marry their pets before you know it, mark my words.

anndddd who cares? As far as I'm concerned people can marry a rock if they feel like it.

Indeed. And they actually can, right now. They just can't get the legal definition of "marriage," which is just a piece of paper and some extended privileges, not anything remotely "sacred," and that stuff wouldn't apply to rocks (or goats for that matter) anyway.

The only problem with legalizing polygamous marriage is logistical, not moral.

Eeyup. This.

[ChairmanPoo]

not anything remotely "sacred," and that stuff wouldn't apply to rocks (or goats for that matter) anyway.

Spoiler: Are you implying my rock is not sacred?!? (click to show/hide)

[anzki4]

not anything remotely "sacred," and that stuff wouldn't apply to rocks (or goats for that matter) anyway.

Spoiler: Are you implying my rock is not sacred?!? (click to show/hide)

Fixed the image link.

[Darvi]

No you didn't.

[Urist Imiknorris]

Like hell you did.

EDIT: Ninjas everywhere.

[anzki4]

Well at least I see it fine that way, whereas the original doesn't work.
Can you see this:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

[Darvi]

Well at least I see it fine that way, whereas the original doesn't work.
Can you see this:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

No.

[anzki4]

Well at least I see it fine that way, whereas the original doesn't work.
Can you see this:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

No.

Wait... Now I can't see them either. WHAT IS THIS MADNESS!?!?

EDIT: Refreshing the page, they occasionally seem to work.

[penguinofhonor]

I can't see any of them.