I wonder what the shortest 'safe' period of waving bridges would be:
as i understand it, an 'on' signal sets the bridge's 'raise/retract' protocol in motion, the 'off' signal the 'lower/extend' protocol. Each takes 100 (+/- 1) step to execute. What confuses me is the interference between 'standing orders' and incoming signals - i was working under the assumption that a bridge that's started to raise/lower but gets the opposite signal in the meantime simply cancels the old job. I'm not sure of this, though, because my experiences suggest that a bridge can instead take the new signal and just chain it up with the old one, executing both in short succession. If this actually happens (not too sure of my counts), this may be specific to which order's the 'old' one and which 'new' order tries to interfere with it. If there's an order that reliably chains up two opposed signals without mutual or one-way abortion, a bridge could theoretically work on, say, a 150-tick cycle, being in one state for 50 ticks and another for 100. But i'm too dumb to even test this, i can't get the logic worked out.
Is there some usable rhyme and reason to signal entanglement, or is the only sane option to just go for a slightly-over-200 period, making sure that the bridge has time for processing the last-received signal fully before sending the next one?