...catching up.
[Warning: Wall of Text Ahead]Orangebottle:Tiruin.
Dear Mr. Bottle. Your decision not to support our campaign is disappointing. It shouldn't be necessary to remind you that we men who lust for power can be vindictive when we achieve it. Once I'm President, you would do well to prepare yourself for a tax audit, a GPS on the trunk of your car, a phone tap, and if you give us the slightest excuse, then straight to Guantanamo with you.
E Pluribus Screw You,Bookthras.Tiruin:Arch-Conservative on all issues! A super PAC is supportive of my case, hello random vote.
I find that unlikely. I don't have evidence to contradict it, but it sounds to me like it's your SuperPAC telling us you are arch-conservative, while you're not
really so... which would be a great way to hide liberal scum. A big enough SuperPAC could get
Nancy Pelosi into the Republican race.
Unvote NativeForeigner and Toaster
Dude, that doesn't work unless you colour it red. You should know that by now.
PPE: Bookthras.
Yes?
Dariush:Actually I am Social Super-Conservative, Economic Super-Conservative, Religious Conservative. I attempted to shift Social, but was roleblocked.
Well, it so happens that I can double-vote anyone who I have inspected who is far enough away from me on religious issues. Let's try to see if you are one of them, shall we?
Dariush,
Dariush.
Moderator: updated vote count, please.
Toaster:Book:
Dariush: I will claim without waiting: He is a full-on Religious Liberal. Opposed to religion completely, doesn't belong to a church, and once referred to religion as "the opiate of the masses". More Marxist than that, you can't get.
How much of that is from the role result, and how much is your own personal expansion of flavor?
Pretty much all of it is from the inspection result (it was quite flavourful). A bit paraphrased to avoid quoting the mod, but it was all there: lack of a church, opposed completely, opiate of the masses, it was all GG's doing.
NativeForeigner:Bookthras: I understand your cautious stance. Allow me to explain, I am the Dark Horse Candidate and I have the best of Conservative interests in mind. I found out about the Liberal invasion early and decided to do something about it, but I had to wait for the right moment to announce my candidacy. As I said, I'm not looking for personal gain, I'm looking to ensure a Conservative victory in this race. If it comes down to it, I would gladly sacrifice my standing in the polls to ensure a true Conservative rises to victory.
Hmmm... sounds a bit too good to be true. We must have lynched
some scum yesterday, and are likely to find some today. I find it improbable that GG felt magnanimous and added another townie to the mix. My instinct with regards to game balance tells me it's much more likely you are a third party, survivor, SK or the like (yeah, metagaming a bit here); but I don't know how to prove it. The fact that you somehow didn't have issue positions at the start increases my suspicions.
From what you say, you appear to have some inside information on some of our competitors. What are you going to do to convince us they're accurate?
I can't do much beyond what I've already done: present them for review, and see if they match the observations of others. Though the double-vote thing on Dariush may help too.
Bookthras: Please explain your vote against Dariush; of course, at your earliest convenience.
Certainly: He's been scummy since D1, avoiding questions, defending ToonyMan, activelurking, OMGUSing (both D1 & D2), and so on. So I investigated his stance on religious issues last night. I found him to be a Religious Liberal. He has stated that he's not, which I know to be a lie, so on top of the above he's a liar about being a liberal.
I can prove I investigated him, by using the double-vote thing I mention above, as it only works on those whose stance I directly know. See:
Vote Mii. Vote Mii. Next vote count, I'll have voted you only once, but Dariush twice; therefore I did in fact inspect him. Unfortunately, it doesn't prove I'm actually telling the truth about my result, but that's up to you people to make your minds about, weigh it with the rest of the evidence, and so on.