[Warning: Wall of Text Ahead]Unvote Everybody.Moderator:Moderator, please clarify: when does the day end? Will there be any more opportunities to extend after D1 ends?
The extension has NOT been used - it is simply available. We'd have to have majority request to extend to use it. If you guys think you need it to get through the weekend, feel free to use it.
OK, I had misunderstood. I thought the extension was already in place. When does the day currently end?
Red means an attack add against another, you can run as many as you want?
Green means a self vote for the straw pole? Would anyone not want to vote themselves?
Yes. Yes (you can also vote as many as you want). Because of noone not votes themselves, no one wins, and no one is protected tonight by their Leader of the Pack status. It's definitely a possible outcome!
I had not realised we could also multi-vote in green... what happens if, say three (or say, nine) people are tied for the top number of green votes? Do all become front runners, or none? Will the front runner mechanic/green votes continue to be on Day 2 and further, or is it a D1 only thing?
McNoble:In particular, Bookthras and Tiruin have been voting more people than there can possibly be mafia+third party in the game at this point. Please be advised that this is starting to look an awful lot like lazy, bandwagony scum play.
"Hey, Dr. Freeman! Don't forget to reload!"
I'm sure you mean well, dude, but I don't need your help to remind me who I'm voting or what effects it may have. If you're curious, I did want to vote
everybody and see how it would be reflected on the vote count, to test GG and to familiarise ourselves with the mechanic. However, I may or may not end the day voting more people than you think is wise; you are free to interpret this how you wish, and vote your conscience. I have been so advised.
It also seems a bit
too helpful. Like you really want to see the town how you're helping it...
Everyone:
Does anybody have any objections to a mass Issue claim?
I do. What purpose would it serve? D1 is too early for any sort of mass claim or cunning plan in any case.
So, to make sure you don't slip out of sight again, I'd like you to tell me your Stance on the Issue of Economics.
You seem too focused on the issues for my tastes. Not that they're not important, but campaigns aren't won with
issues, they're won with
arguments. A bit fishing, and a bit more of that "too helpful" vibe.
Tiruin:So a shortened version before I miss any of my multiple votes.
Unvote Dariush: You missed an RVS question.
Unvote Mii
Please explain this. Why would you miss any of your multiple votes? How many do you have? Why? Are they temporary? Also, for Votes/Unvotes to count, they must be coloured
red.How could I answer the question on why he chose his name when even I don't know why he chose his name.
Even I? That's a suspicious wording... as in, why would any random bloke know it, but why would even his partner-in-crime know it?
Tiruin: You said earlier that Pranz's post made you think he was scum. Why? If you thought he was scum, why didn't you press him further? Do you think Andrew is scum?
How suspicious? I worded it to mean me, specifically me. Are you trying to incriminate me by putting fake words into my mouth?
Oh, and Pranz hasn't posted anything from then on by the way.
Re: wording. Yes, your "me, specifically me" seems suspicious to me. A generic person without knowledge would say "I don't know", rather than "even I don't know"; the "even" (and your subsequent denial) implies an anxiety to portray that you have even less knowledge of his name than others who also don't or wouldn't know, betraying that there's perhaps a secondary channel of communication, like a scumchat.
Re: Pranz. You didn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether he had posted, I asked why you thought he was scum, and how have you pressured him to find out. Avoidance
and unapologetic unsupported vote in one sentence.
Tiruin It's people like you who give bad names to us true Conservatives.
Sure, Andrew425, target me and me alone, without any reason.
Plus a nice OMGUS to complete the trifecta. Yeah, you are scummy.
PranzBookthras and Tiruin:
why are you voting for >80% of the players?
See my first answer to McNoble.
Why are you putting a majority vote on me? Do you think it's beneficial for town to kill someone D1? [then later] Admittedly, i'm not very good at mafia, but i must ask you to place some trust in me. If i survive until next day I'll hopefully have some useful information for you all.
Dude! "why lynch me?" "you'll regret it!" If you are town, you're doing it wrong. If you are scum, you are also doing it wrong. Do better. Or we'll do without.
ToonyMan:I see no actual useful content from you. Please give me your reads on Toaster, Mii, and Dariush, and who would you green-vote if you couldn't green-vote yourself?
Dariush:ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME[...]Go fuck yourself, and by 'fuck yourself' I mean 'fuck yourself and go hang'.
Shut the fuck up. Why don't you do something useful instead of yelling like a lunatic? Your top four scumpicks, please, and details on how you plan to pursue the lynch of at least two.
Toaster:Actually, here's a thought question (that everyone should read): If the majority thinks that X person is town, why shouldn't we, instead of greenvoting them, red vote everyone else? That will end the game with that person left alive, and their alignment (if we're correct, town) winning. If someone claims cop with a town result on them, we could greenvote the town result person to protect them and lynch the cop claimant. If the cop is town, then we could lynch everyone but said townie.
Dude, I think you just broke the game. We should
totally do that as soon as we have a solid lead on a townie.