Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Master0r0]

Is it not possible for you too add an element of multiplayer over the net, Hosting a map on one of there systems that they can each build a fort on to either fight or work side by side, This would be an interesting feature and would make the use of trade depots alot more fun, Due to the trading between each fortress maybe make it so that map sizes can be rather large so you could own whole nations, that will eventually have armies to conquer your freinds fort or maybe a goblin fort.
Just a suggestion that i think would be awesome.

[IT 000]

Suggested, discussed put on the eternal suggestions for voting.

[FallingWhale]

Glare.

[Javarock]

Suggested, discussed put on the eternal suggestions for voting.

Damn... You took my answer.

Seen this topic nearly 30 times?... Unfourtunatly the lag would be tremendous... And the way the turns work...

[MrWiggles]

The lag would be horrible, but another major issue thats been explored in one of the more productive threads about this suggestion, was frame/turn synchronization; especially concerning the frequent pausing that happens during normal gameplay.

Though, there is telenet thrid party app. It doesn't allow for multiplayer action, but does allow for remote playing, and live fortress visiting.

[Uristocrat]

Suggested, discussed put on the eternal suggestions for voting.

There's also DFFD for succession forts.  No, they're not the same as multiplayer, but they can be fun.

[anon_outlaw]

why would there be lag? he was talking about hosting separate forts, you could play online season by season and the game just sent the updated info between them as several players manned an entire civ. they wouldn't really even be able to see each-other and the most contact they could have would be sending migrants, diplomats/representatives and trade caravans. it would be slow but i think pretty popular.