Well, first of all, I welcome a fellow Russian into this community.
Now, on to the review.
The review is, in general, less positive than I'd expect from a "positive" review ( ), and there are quite a number of typos of varying magnitude.
The introductory part is a nice move, it really tells things about the game that are hardly possible to describe with simple feature lists.
The two paragraphs after that are also alright. You do move into a more "free-speaking" style, which I would find unfitting for any serious "review" (the use of slang, as well), but that's just me.
The following text, while still in the same free mode of speech, is a little less coherent, and looks like an attempt to encompass the examples of the most notable of the game's features or principles in a few sentences (not unlike the way PowerGoals are formed), which sometimes is abruptly interrupted by "but I didn't get that far", and more or less fails to form a coherent picture of the game, in my opinion.
Once you start describing the game's (fairly obvious) shortcomings in the form of the interface and the "sandboxiness", you make them sound (to me) quite more negative than you probably intended. Combined with the uncertain picture of the game's "bright sides", this description creates a more negative impression than the review's beginning would suggest.
Overall, I'd rate the review with 3.5 out of 5. It's faily informative and true (for what it's worth), but somewhat incomprehensive.
I myself am fairly bad at reviewing, so perhaps it is better than I think. Also, I might be biased, already being a fan of the game. You should wait until someone comments your review on that site.
And welcome to the game! May your dwarves live long, and may their deaths be swift! :p