Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!  (Read 3322 times)

Killas[SiN]

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SiN]
    • View Profile
IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« on: March 10, 2010, 06:30:22 pm »

Hi guys,

So, here I am, doing some boring IGCSE creative writing assignment. I need some people to critique it, as in, give me feedback on how I could improve. As I seriously don't want to fail English (Was borderline last year!)

It's a creative writing piece, purely descriptive. So basically I'm not trying to tell a story, but trying to describe a place. (Or event... Without actually telling the story... If that makes sense.)

The Bearer of Light

They stand in saturnine silence – not even the howl of bladed wind; the lashing of ice-cold sleet nor the electric black rumblings of thunder could distract them from their post. Like watchmen, they keep vigil over the fjord – they stare into the gray fodder of the horizon with their sightless eyes, seeing beyond the frigid depths of water that snakes its way across the gorge. High atop the canyon, upon a small mesa of crumbling rock they jut out.

Once, they were grand. They were a network of towers; stone, brick and mortar slotted in so perfectly, so intimately, that it was almost meticulous. Built in times long past… They are mighty no longer. Like a grizzled warrior advancing into the failings of old age, this once resolute bulwark of gray stone has fallen into disrepair. Many of the towers that remain do so precariously – they stilt and crook at awkward angles, missing a capstone, or brace or guy – whittled away gently by the ever present wind. And when those loose stones are snatched away, they are gifted momentary flight – until they plummet like torpedoes into the darkness below. A soft plunk is the only sound when the wayward stone slips into the deep – where it is instantly forgotten.

Shaped like octopodes, the towers consist of a central turret attached to hundreds of metal chains, which protrude defiantly into the unerring sky. To support the tower in its unsteady position, the metal chains anchor the tower to the surrounding cliff-face, fastened into place by a massive iron ring. The unknown architects constructed these sentinels for a reason – a purpose long since lost to the eddies and flows of time. The ashen blocks of stone are slowly
being recoloured – the muted green of the vines and moss encroach upon the upper tiers of the spire, reaching for the heavens themselves. At the base of one of these towers lies an old door; the wood is discoloured and brittle, held in place only by a brace of cast iron. All you can see inside is the meandering of heavy motes of dust against the blackness of the tower. For such an ancient structure, no outside light has managed to penetrate its cloak of shadows – the only thing noticeable is the lack of noticeable things.

So light up the darkness with a torch. Through the flickering illumination, a sombre staircase greets you; spiraling skywards into the cover of darkness. A vile, putrid smell makes you gag for a second… but lingers in your nostrils much longer. The odour reeks of sulfur, mixed with the unearthly combination of burning plastic and smouldering tar. Thankfully, the smell is gone as fast as it came. The sound of your steps upon the chill stone blocks of the stairwell echo, resonating in the air much longer than they ought to. All the while a pale chill moans and whispers from over your shoulder, leaving you tense – this is no mundane place… That much is certain.

Up and up and up, the stone staircase rises. The blocks that function as steps have been worn smooth from age. Despite the creeping ivy that chokes the outside, there is a profound absence of life inside – no chittering of mice, or spider’s embroidery. But as you climb towards the apex, you being to hear faint noises. They sound like the screams and wails of something unearthly, interspersed with the loud, urgent rattling of metal. Around you, the austere walls have slowly revealed scars of a previous age – gases, clefts and notches pit the walls – some seem to be claw marks, others the slash of a sword of the cleave of an axe. Dark rags of soot also linger, kicked up by footfalls. The staircase ends in a short landing. On either side, earthen red tapestries line the walls… Depictions of flaming daemons, bloody-eyed heretics and occult fiends – raping, slaughtering and pillaging. Houses burn, castles fall. Beyond the macabre art lies a charred wooden door. Carved upon the door is what seems to be a loop of intertwining roses. Upon closer inspection, they reveal themselves to be minute carvings of skulls, grinning eternally. Here and there, chips and cracks mar the perfect intricacy. The noises you heard before are from beyond the door – the screams are now hoarse whispers, the fearful pounding has dwindled to silence. Scratched into the centre of the door in thin, shaky lettering is a single word – Lucifer.

Slowly, you place your hand on the charcoal door – and push.

Outside, the elements tore at the sentinels furiously. But not even the howl of bladed wind; the lashing of ice-cold sleet or the electric black rumblings of tower could distract them from their post. Below them, a writhing leviathan eagerly snapped up the tumbling rocks from above.

Word Count: 798


Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!
Logged
You should make Korean pros into game-ending, SPEED:0 megabeasts.
A Jaedong appears at your fort.
DF: gg
DF has left the game.

Wimdit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2010, 03:20:53 am »

Not bad, not bad. Keep in mind that I'm not exactly qualified to give you expert advice, but here's what I think could be better.

The thing that jumps out at me most is the disproportionate number of dashes and ellipses, and I think you have a few too many semicolons as well. In general, I don't like to use them when a comma or a full stop would serve the same purpose. I'm sort of picky when it comes to sentence structure, so it's a bit hard to resist going through this word by word and rewriting it to suit my tastes, but I'll just pick a few sentences.

Quote
They stand in saturnine silence – not even the howl of bladed wind; the lashing of ice-cold sleet nor the electric black rumblings of thunder could distract them from their post.

The first dash would work better as a colon, or perhaps a full stop if you wanted more of an impact. It's the first sentence, so you probably do want more impact. I'm not sure about 'saturnine,' though I suppose you are writing for people with a good vocabulary. Personally, I'd use 'grim' or 'stoic,' despite the lost alliterative appeal. Now, the next phrase: think of semicolons as a replacement for a full stop. For lists, you should use commas. I've never liked the idea of using semicolons for things like 'I've told you once; I've told you twice; and I've told you three times,' though I suppose it's gramatically correct. I don't know about the choice of conjunctions and adverbs either. I'd write it like this:

Quote
They stand in grim silence. Neither howl of bladed wind, nor lashing of ice-cold sleet, nor the electric black rumblings of thunder can distract them from their vigil.

Of course, that would mean you couldn't use the word vigil in the next sentence. Also, next sentence should have a colon rather than a dash, and 'gray fodder of the horizon' doesn't make much sense. Fodder? And their eyes aren't just sightless, they don't have eyes at all. Though anyone who isn't looking closely isn't likely to realize that. I'd write 'they stare into the gray horizon, peering into the frigid stream...' Note that that use of an ellipse indicates that I trailed off and omitted something, I'm not suggesting that you put it there. Really, I never use ellipses except for that, and sometimes during dialogue.

Quote
They were a network of towers; stone, brick and mortar slotted in so perfectly, so intimately, that it was almost meticulous. Built in times long past… They are mighty no longer.

Okay. That semicolon is actually alright, even though you wouldn't put a full stop there. The full stop thing is just a loose guide: what's really bad is using them as commas. The problem here is the ellipse and the use of 'meticulous.' Meticulous isn't the sort of adjective that you would use to describe superb craftsmanship, it describes the care with which it was crafted. So:

Quote
They were a network of towers; stone, brick and mortar slotted in so perfectly, so intimately, that it almost seemed as though they would stand until the end of time. But time did claim them, as it does all things, and they are mighty no longer.

Good use of the word 'intimately,' though. I never would have thought to use it that way. I changed the second sentence because of the 'end of time' thing, but 'But they were built in times long past, and they are mighty no longer' works too. Oh, and you change into the singular in the next sentence. I'd recommend you don't do that.

I could go on for ages, but I'm getting a little tired of doing this, and I doubt you want to read through my opinions much longer. If you like, I can give you some more advice later.
Logged

Virroken

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2010, 06:17:14 am »

How is this getting you a borderline grade? That's craaazzzzzzy talk.

Quote
Once, they were grand. They were a network of towers; stone, brick and mortar slotted in so perfectly, so intimately, that it was almost meticulous. Built in times long past They are mighty no longer. Like a grizzled warrior advancing into the failings of old age, this once resolute bulwark of gray stone has fallen into disrepair
Get rid of the ellipsis. Also, there's something about the verb tensing that throws me out of the flow.

Quote
Once, they were grand - a network of towers; etc etc
Maybe? Starting two sentences with they is a bit weak, considering how well you pull off the rest of it.
Logged

Wimdit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2010, 06:59:54 am »

Maybe? Starting two sentences with they is a bit weak, considering how well you pull off the rest of it.

Not to question your erudition, Virroken, but how is starting two sentences with the same word weak? I would argue that it actually increases the effect. Repetition and all that. Your suggested sentence structure seems to me to be a bit awkward, with two long stops in such close proximity.

Ah, but this is probably overly pedantic. Here, some more constructive comments.

Quote
Shaped like octopodes, the towers consist of a central turret attached to hundreds of metal chains, which protrude defiantly into the unerring sky. To support the tower in its unsteady position, the metal chains anchor the tower to the surrounding cliff-face, fastened into place by a massive iron ring. The unknown architects constructed these sentinels for a reason – a purpose long since lost to the eddies and flows of time.

A good sentence, but as I said, I'm picky. I'd use 'octopi' in place of 'octopodes,' but again, I guess your audience is fairly learned. The description of the chains is a little unclear: the way you've phrased it makes it sound like the chains are standing up by themselves. Say the turret protrudes and the chains follow it, or something. Also, you make it sound as though the chains are attached to a single ring: if they are, make it a bit more clear, possibly with the word 'single.' If they aren't, put an 'each' in or say 'rings' rather than 'ring.' 'Unerring sky' is also a little strange. What errors could a sky possibly make? You could say the tower shoots unerringly into the sky, though.

'Eddies and flows of time' is a good phrase as well. Thumbs up for that. And the dash here is fine.
Logged

Virroken

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2010, 07:43:42 am »

I'm not actually sure. It's 4:30 AM for me, and I'm still procrastinating grinding away at a paper due in a couple hours. My mind is pretty fried.

That paragraph in particular jumped out at me relative to the rest. He took care to vary up the subject of each sentence in the rest of the piece, with smell->odor->smell being the only other time he uses the same subject word twice in a short space. Maybe repetition is a good thing, but I just have a feeling that, within his style, he'd rather not do that.

Yeah, nevermind. I reread it, and it is definitely intended repetition. Don't know how I missed it the first time through.
Logged

Armok

  • Bay Watcher
  • God of Blood
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2010, 08:26:23 am »

I really like your writing style.
Logged
So says Armok, God of blood.
Sszsszssoo...
Sszsszssaaayysss...
III...

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2010, 01:40:14 pm »

Maybe? Starting two sentences with they is a bit weak, considering how well you pull off the rest of it.

Not to question your erudition, Virroken, but how is starting two sentences with the same word weak? I would argue that it actually increases the effect. Repetition and all that. Your suggested sentence structure seems to me to be a bit awkward, with two long stops in such close proximity.

Because 'they' is a very weak word to repeat, in general.  Repetition places an emphasis on a particular word, but in the case of a word whose repetition holds no actual significance, it serves only to deteriorate the work.

Example:

They were the keepers of the keys, the men who stood against the great flames at the end of the world.  They were the men who Aspen slew, laughing as blood ran trickly-down his sunken cheeks.

Other example:

They were the keepers of the keys.  They were tall and thin and meandering, with pale hands that fluttered and flopped like doves.  They were not given to laughter, nor to the cool solemnity of silence.


In the first example, the repetition puts an emphasis on the dichotomy.  In the second, it's mostly just there and does very little good, though it doesn't detract as much as the repetition of another random word might.



In any case, the sentence structure needs to be fixed.  Cull as many dashes, ellipses, and semicolons as possible, especially since you seem to frequently prefer a semicolon where a colon would be more correct.  Additionally, you're making the standard "vocabulary error"--anyone young with a large vocabulary inevitably wants to use it.  You would probably be better served by looking for a more basic word in most cases.  This is because humans have certain associative/symbolic knowledge that stems mostly from basic nouns and adjectives, so in setting a scene it serves one well to capitalize on such.

I also suggest that you scrap most of your adverbs.  They are unneeded and disturb the flow.
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

Killas[SiN]

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SiN]
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2010, 03:49:32 pm »

Thanks for your help guys...

I'm working on a redraft now with better punctuation.
For the people who don't know, people that do the English IGCSE course have to submit 3 pieces of writing - one creative, one argumentative and one responsive to the text. This is the creative one. It gets read by some dudes at Cambridge. All fancy n' Shizz.

Thanks Wimdit for your rather detailed analysis, I'll put much of your suggestions in place.

Quote
I'd use 'octopi' in place of 'octopodes'
Octopodes is the actual plural for Octopus, although not used much.

I really like your writing style.

^^ The God of Blood likes meh writing :D


Quote
'gray fodder of the horizon' doesn't make much sense.
You're kinda missing the point of it being a creative writing piece. That sentence was meant to be figurative. It's supposed to help you paint a mental image. Also, the 'not making sense' helps in creating a rather descriptive, yet unreal atmosphere - helps in seperating it from the mundane. (In my opinion atleast :P)

How is this getting you a borderline grade? That's craaazzzzzzy talk.
Well, my definition of fail is that I gotta do exceptionally good (A to A*) cause I want need to get a scholarship... Cause with half my family getting cancer and seizures and all that, I'm, not sure they could afford to send me to Uni... But nevermind.

Again, thanks for your advice guys!

I'm reworking the piece now and will hopefully submit an edit later in the day. Cheers!

~Much appreciated~
Logged
You should make Korean pros into game-ending, SPEED:0 megabeasts.
A Jaedong appears at your fort.
DF: gg
DF has left the game.

Greatoliver

  • Bay Watcher
  • Blobby!
    • View Profile
Re: IGCSE Creative Writing - Critique Please!
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2010, 05:04:08 pm »

As some general advice to the creative writing:  I did the GCSE last year, and the marks were not dependant on the plot at all.... It seems to be all about the quality of writing and variety of vocab.... I wrote an absolutely terrible story, but was given full marks as it ticked tho boxes, so the criticism you've got is good.

It being IGCSE however, may mean that all my advice is all void.  And plus, you should probably already know this.

I tried   :-\
Logged