Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Domestication tags  (Read 811 times)

Grek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Domestication tags
« on: January 28, 2010, 07:19:25 pm »
This tag would be added either to a creature or an civ entity and would make that entity treat the animal in question as a domestic creature just as [COMMON_DOMESTIC] does now. The key difference is that it would be domestic for the specified civ entity, not for all civ entities that domesticate creatures.

This would be used to have elven wagons be pulled by deer, goblins with tame wolves and dwarves with [VERMIN_HUNTER] bats all without humans caravans having weird animals or dwarves showing up with pet mooses on embark.
Logged

Vester

  • Bay Watcher
  • [T_WORD:AWE-INSPIRING:bloonk]
    • View Profile
Re: Domestication tags
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2010, 07:39:33 pm »
What's wrong with a pet moose? Those things are huge and Fun.

Anyway, I agree. It would certainly negate the need for the tag that makes civs use animals of a certain biome-type (like [EVIL] or [GOOD]).
Logged
Quote
"Land of song," said the warrior bard, "though all the world betray thee - one sword at least thy rights shall guard; one faithful harp shall praise thee."

Pilsu

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Domestication tags
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2010, 11:50:23 am »
Tags should also be added to keep dwarves from taking on cows as personal pets
Logged

Mel_Vixen

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hobby: accidently thread derailment
    • View Profile
Re: Domestication tags
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2010, 12:07:31 pm »
Well i know some people that consider theyr farm-animals as part of the family. The strangest thing i heard was "My Best Firend was a HORSE."
Logged
[sarcasm] You know what? I love grammar Nazis! They give me that warm and fuzzy feeling. I am so ashamed of my bad english and that my first language is German. [/sarcasm]

Proud to be a Furry.