Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?  (Read 1366 times)

Re: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2007, 05:13:00 pm »

Well I don't live on a desert island in a volocano and not know some things about robotics...so I after I try and take over the world for the Nth time I'll get started on it  :D
Logged
warfs are fearless...unless they are interupted by a deer.

Dreamer

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2007, 05:27:00 pm »

Hello; learn from Star Wars, people.  Anything with legs can easily be taken down by a fighter that's not even remotely aerodynamic yet still flies, by a pack of small fur-covered dwarves holding a rope, two swinging logs, or a single person with a magnetic grappling hook and a grenade.

Let's just stick with the treads and nukes, for now, lest we repeat the mistakes from a long, long time ago...

;)

Logged
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲/
◄Nothing Beats Menacing►
/▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼\

Lightman

  • Bay Watcher
  • The groboclones are looking for you.
    • View Profile
Re: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2007, 09:39:00 pm »

berent: I remember the NES, sure... never played Tecmo Super Bowl, though. I did play the John Madden games on Megadrive (Genesis in the States). On NES I tend to remember games like Metroid, Zelda, Bionic Commando, Blaster Master, Goonies II, etc.

Angus the goblin killer: Most of my friends love American football and I know plenty of people that play it here in Europe. I've played it in the States too and nobody wore protective gear. However, of course professional players do. NFL players suffer many serious injuries including concussions. Try getting out on the field with a bunch of guys who average 150kg (up to 170kg) and want to pummel you. Nobody would call you a sissy for not letting them practice their throwing / wrestling moves and splattering your brains all over the fortress walls.  ;)

Logged

Darkchampion

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?
« Reply #18 on: August 13, 2007, 05:59:00 am »

quote:
Hello; learn from Star Wars, people. Anything with legs can easily be taken down by a fighter that's not even remotely aerodynamic yet still flies, by a pack of small fur-covered dwarves holding a rope, two swinging logs, or a single person with a magnetic grappling hook and a grenade.

Let's just stick with the treads and nukes, for now, lest we repeat the mistakes from a long, long time ago...


Not to mention all of the exposed joints and moving parts, no matter how well armored will make it extremely vulnerable compared to a tank. It would also have a much higher profile and make it an easy target.

However this is just too damn cool.  :)

Logged

I3erent

  • Bay Watcher
  • The mounted dwarf has gone bErZeRk
    • View Profile
Logged
quot;I got really stoned a couple days ago and ended up talking to THIS GUY. anyway... I''m really drunk now. The guy said: There is this application called "Mya" MI-AH that makes animations of people that he paid $2000 for. F- that Jazz ARMOK ROCKS. FIGHT THE MAN, GO TEAM!

I3erent

  • Bay Watcher
  • The mounted dwarf has gone bErZeRk
    • View Profile
Re: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?
« Reply #20 on: August 16, 2007, 11:13:00 am »

Come on tell me that aint sweet!!!!!!!!!
Logged
quot;I got really stoned a couple days ago and ended up talking to THIS GUY. anyway... I''m really drunk now. The guy said: There is this application called "Mya" MI-AH that makes animations of people that he paid $2000 for. F- that Jazz ARMOK ROCKS. FIGHT THE MAN, GO TEAM!

Trichordate

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Tecmo footbal vs DF, which is more addictive?
« Reply #21 on: August 16, 2007, 05:22:00 pm »

custer's revenge
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]