Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Weirdo]

I think we should have a list of GMs and what they're good at. Therefore, instead of writing the type of things they usually do (such as "casual story" or "deep story"), we write what they excel in doing (such as "good at casual story" or "good at deep story"). This would prevent people from going to a GM's casually story games because they like all his deep stories, and instead would make it far easier for a GM to get players to a game he is good at making simply by advertising that it has elements he's good at.

Why wasn't this suggested before? +1000!

[Tomasque]

I think we should have a list of GMs and what they're good at. Therefore, instead of writing the type of things they usually do (such as "casual story" or "deep story"), we write what they excel in doing (such as "good at casual story" or "good at deep story"). This would prevent people from going to a GM's casually story games because they like all his deep stories, and instead would make it far easier for a GM to get players to a game he is good at making simply by advertising that it has elements he's good at.

Why wasn't this suggested before? +1000!

Dunno. When I first found this thread (thanks, Weirdo) I glanced at the posts and I  thought that's what people were saying. When I reread everything, I realised that they really didn't mention it (_DivideByZero_ and Pencil_Art kinda did) so I added it myself.