Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Is it intentional for animals without [CHILD] tags to be un-domesticable?  (Read 653 times)

SelcouthBadger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Is it intentional for animals without [CHILD] tags to be un-domesticable?
« on: August 12, 2014, 06:38:06 pm »
According to the wiki, only child animals can reach Tame status. Now that Giant Cave Spiders, Dragons, Rocs, etcetera may breed, shouldn't they be able to be fully tamed too? Or is this an intentional mechanic to keep dorfs from owning tame monsters? Seems like if they are able to be trained masterfully then they should be tamable as well.
Logged

SeelenJägerTee

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it intentional for animals without [CHILD] tags to be un-domesticable?
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2014, 07:45:49 pm »
Well to me it sounds more like a feature if you never truly can tame dragons and Rocs.
For all those more mundane creatures out there that may lack the tag ... not so much.
Logged

SelcouthBadger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it intentional for animals without [CHILD] tags to be un-domesticable?
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2014, 08:50:38 pm »
Helmet snakes also lack the child tag and they aren't exactly fanciful...maybe I'll throw together a bug report about it; I'm going to look through the raws and see just how many creatures lack the child tag.
Logged

CR055H41RZ

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it intentional for animals without [CHILD] tags to be un-domesticable?
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2014, 09:52:28 pm »
post the bug rep here for reference
Logged

SelcouthBadger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it intentional for animals without [CHILD] tags to be un-domesticable?
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2014, 09:17:16 pm »
Logged