Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16]

Author Topic: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.  (Read 13106 times)

Parsely

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • My games!
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #225 on: January 26, 2014, 12:20:23 pm »

Lasers are far more accurate than bullets! Attachments won't help with accuracy unless they're sights or something, but they wouldn't help as much as using lasers would!
Logged

MonkeyHead

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yma o hyd...
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #226 on: January 26, 2014, 12:21:36 pm »

We should try out some prototype lasers on the captive - for fun just so we know it is worth using them.

GiglameshDespair

  • Bay Watcher
  • Beware! Once I have posted, your thread is doomed!
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #227 on: January 26, 2014, 12:23:32 pm »

We should interrogate the captive first before lasering it.
Logged
Old and cringe account. Disregard.

MonkeyHead

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yma o hyd...
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #228 on: January 26, 2014, 12:24:42 pm »

I feel that the two needn't be mutually exclusive...

Parsely

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • My games!
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #229 on: January 26, 2014, 12:24:59 pm »

We should interrogate the captive first before lasering it.
Interrogate it with experimental lasers!
Logged

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #230 on: January 26, 2014, 12:33:05 pm »

Oh come on, why not go with good old railguns?
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #231 on: January 26, 2014, 12:35:52 pm »

Why use weapons for interrogation at all?

Geez, guys, we have a range. Why not test the guns there?
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

MonkeyHead

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yma o hyd...
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #232 on: January 26, 2014, 12:37:09 pm »

Prof Jones sighed...

"Lasers make sense as these things appear to have a whole body sensory apparatus that would be easy to compromise with laser light, in addition to secondary damage due to burning. I am all for rail guns, but first we need to see just how vulnerable these things are to coherent light as part of a full and thorough evaluation/interrogation."

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #233 on: January 26, 2014, 01:39:06 pm »

"Can we please get attachments? at the very least they wont take long, give us some support in the field and allow us to shove things on whatever weapons we get next. Judging from the results of fire in the terror mission, a small mounted flamethrower or a grenade launcher launching fire grenades will be of great use, while a bayonet or something will help us with close quarters."
"And dont you dare test weapons on my captive. I am not going to get you another one if you just waste them."
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

Shinotsa

  • Bay Watcher
  • Content lion is content
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #234 on: January 27, 2014, 03:19:29 pm »

Dr. Shinotsa suggests that the research focus be on interrogation, followed by armor, followed by upgrades, followed by lasers. This plan of action is the product of much deep thought, and the emphasis on armor has been put to make sure that we prevent any more soldiers from becoming disarmed in the line of duty.

Edit: Also make sure we have good leg armor, don't want our forces to be defeeted now do we?
« Last Edit: January 28, 2014, 01:37:22 pm by Shinotsa »
Logged
Quote from: EvilTim
"You shouldn't anthropomorphize vehicles. They hate it"

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #235 on: January 27, 2014, 10:26:58 pm »

Dr. Shinotsa suggests that the research focus be on interrogation, followed by armor, followed by attachments, followed by lasers. This plan of action is the product of much deep thought, and the emphasis on armor has been put to make sure that we prevent any more soldiers from becoming disarmed in the line of duty.

Edit: Also make sure we have good leg armor, don't want our forces to be defeeted now do we?

*Throws eggs at shin*
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #236 on: January 27, 2014, 11:25:15 pm »

Dr. Shinotsa suggests that the research focus be on interrogation, followed by armor, followed by attachments, followed by lasers. This plan of action is the product of much deep thought, and the emphasis on armor has been put to make sure that we prevent any more soldiers from becoming disarmed in the line of duty.

Edit: Also make sure we have good leg armor, don't want our forces to be defeeted now do we?
*Throws eggs at shin*
*helps tryar clean off his lower leg*
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #237 on: January 28, 2014, 12:11:11 am »

I walked into that one, didn't I? :P
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: X-COM: Only War Science and Engineering thread.
« Reply #238 on: January 28, 2014, 08:10:00 am »

Yup. You really put your foot in your mouth.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16]