Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Praise the lard?  (Read 1723 times)

Aklyon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Fate~
    • View Profile
Re: Praise the lard?
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2011, 01:32:42 pm »

I thought this was a thread about how lard was suddenly good for you.
Logged
Crystalline (SG)
Sigtext
Quote from: RedKing
It's known as the Oppai-Kaiju effect. The islands of Japan generate a sort anti-gravity field, which allows breasts to behave as if in microgravity. It's also what allows Godzilla and friends to become 50 stories tall, and lets ninjas run up the side of a skyscraper.

Criptfeind

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Praise the lard?
« Reply #16 on: March 25, 2011, 01:50:32 pm »

I ate 37 pounds of lard before I read the thread.

If I die I blame cough drop for false advertising.
Logged

CoughDrop

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Praise the lard?
« Reply #17 on: March 25, 2011, 01:54:47 pm »

I ate 37 pounds of lard before I read the thread.

If I die I blame cough drop for false advertising.

Better fill out the paperwork before the fatal heart attack rears its ugly head.  :P

Edit: THIS IS MY 666th POST!!! YEAAAA
« Last Edit: March 25, 2011, 02:02:27 pm by CoughDrop »
Logged
"It's one thing to feel that you are on the right path, but it's another to think yours is the only path."

Footkerchief

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Juffo-Wup is strong in this place.
    • View Profile
Re: Praise the lard?
« Reply #18 on: March 25, 2011, 02:28:16 pm »

Alright, got the article to load. Looked pretty flimsy to me. I'm calling correlation-causation error here.

I don't see anyone in the article or this thread claiming that the study demonstrates causation.

Also, "we adjusted for variables like age, race, gender, education, income, and baseline body mass index."  So yeah, it's significant.
Logged

Tellemurius

  • Bay Watcher
  • Positively insane Tech Thaumaturgist
    • View Profile
Re: Praise the lard?
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2011, 02:37:19 pm »

Alright, got the article to load. Looked pretty flimsy to me. I'm calling correlation-causation error here.

I don't see anyone in the article or this thread claiming that the study demonstrates causation.

Also, "we adjusted for variables like age, race, gender, education, income, and baseline body mass index."  So yeah, it's significant.

All studies do not point the finger, if they did then this is fail statistics.
Pages: 1 [2]