Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24]

Author Topic: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio  (Read 22562 times)

Jerick

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #345 on: March 27, 2019, 05:15:18 am »

Quote from: Votebox
LOADOUT:
No new loadout (save die): (0)
Force Recon: (2) Madman, Jerick

PLAN:
A Very Mad Man's Very Mad Plan (requires Force Recon loadout): (2) Madman, Jerick
Logged

NUKE9.13

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #346 on: March 27, 2019, 05:18:56 am »

Quote from: Votebox
LOADOUT:
No new loadout (save die): (0)
Force Recon: (3) Madman, Jerick, NUKE9.13

PLAN:
A Very Mad Man's Very Mad Plan (requires Force Recon loadout): (3) Madman, Jerick, NUKE9.13
Logged
Long Live United Forenia!

helmacon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Just a smol Angel
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #347 on: March 28, 2019, 04:33:09 pm »

It occurs to me that despite general agreement on it, the plan in question does not appear to include the gauntlet loadout.
Logged
Science is Meta gaming IRL. Humans are cheating fucks.

Jerick

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #348 on: March 28, 2019, 05:01:01 pm »

Well you see you're getting confused. He posted a Force Recon plan and Force Reconnaissance loadout and he also posted "A Very Mad Man's Very Mad Plan" but that was edited in and in a spoiler (cause of length) where the plans and loadout suggestions he posted were in quotes. Which in no way could be confusing at all. But yes the "A Very Mad Man's Very Mad Plan" has the gauntlet loadout in it where as the force recon plan doesn't.
Logged

NUKE9.13

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #349 on: March 28, 2019, 08:13:07 pm »

That is an issue, now that you mention it. It’d be good if Madman could remove/spoiler the other plan, to avoid confusion.
Logged
Long Live United Forenia!

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #350 on: March 28, 2019, 08:23:41 pm »

...is it REALLY that confusing to mention in unspoilered text that the plan is in a spoiler, to label the spoiler with the name of the plan, and note that it's only in a spoiler due to the length of plan?
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

evictedSaint

  • Bay Watcher
  • if (ANNOYED_W_FANS==true) { KILL_CHAR(rand()); }
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #351 on: March 28, 2019, 08:28:44 pm »

I've got it, don't sweat it.

helmacon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Just a smol Angel
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #352 on: March 28, 2019, 08:55:11 pm »

Ah, I see it now, but yes. It was in fact rather confusing.
Logged
Science is Meta gaming IRL. Humans are cheating fucks.

NUKE9.13

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Wands Race 2: The Great War - Abbraccio
« Reply #353 on: March 29, 2019, 01:30:19 am »

...is it REALLY that confusing to mention in unspoilered text that the plan is in a spoiler, to label the spoiler with the name of the plan, and note that it's only in a spoiler due to the length of plan?
Someone was confused by it. That's empirical evidence that yes, it is confusing.
I mean, eS wasn't confused, so it's not an issue, but a less attentive GM could've absolutely clicked the link in the votebox, glanced at the post, seen only one plan, copied the plan to their text editor of choice and closed the post.
Logged
Long Live United Forenia!
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24]