heh, you guys really need to chill out.
Every one of you people are entitled to your unique oppinion, as am I. I strongly encourage people that they should argue for what they believe in, as you have done. A forum is meant and built for discussion. An argument is but a variant of the same, regardless of content.
If you want to skip the discussion for personal attacks, that is fine with me. Life would grow boring otherwise. But you will have no right to blame me for responding in kind.
Now let me spell this out one one last time:
Savok likes the wiki, and rightly so. Savok believes that spreading knowledge of the wiki will improve the overall skill of the community, which it does. On the other hand, I believe that the wiki is a great tool, but is not the universal cure. There are bettter ways to spread knowledge and wisdom than simply directing people to the DF bible. The reasoning behind that belief is that if everyone learns to play the same way, we will figure out nothing new, and want nothing new. Hello stagnationville, population: suck.
The main reason we need the wiki at all is that the in-game documentation has been deemed inadequate. So then, since you are packed to the gills with tasty wiki lore, why not offer to rewrite the in-game manual for Toady?
Now you have 2 choices. You can counter my argument with one of your own. Or troll this post and me. I would advise against the latter because its not a good thing to have bait in your mouth and egg on your face, just sayin.