Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Lagslayer

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 283
1
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 11:45:07 am »
Then how else would you prefer to argue the subject? Birth rates are declining, globally. Pure and simple. You expect there to be a rebound, but there's no evidence that such a rebound would happen.

The entire first half of that image isn't projection. It's actual estimate. You can see the decline for yourself.
That is but a single model. Other projections are quite different.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population

2
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 11:33:42 am »
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

"Stabilize"
"Projection"

3
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 11:29:17 am »
*ahem* Isn't every country in Europe a white ethnostate? Maybe you could look towards Iceland?
>Just move to an increasingly smaller area. I SWEAR we won't come after you again like we did all those other times!
Isn't every country in africa a black ethnostate? Isn't every country in the middle east an arab ethnostate? Isn't every east asian country an oriental ethnostate?


Quote
I am a white person and you disgust me.
I don't give a fuck what color you are. Your opinions are still shit.



Yes, but most other countries with the same issue don't have overcrowding as an excuse.
My point still stands, perhaps even moreso. Those other countries should stabilize even faster

4
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 11:15:45 am »
My post mentioned explicitly that it only applies to those who actually consider themselves of the same culture as the country in question. A failure to integrate (due to aforementioned lack of patriotism, possibly stemming from a "glory days are behind us" attitude in culture) means that the new-coming immigrants would not also suffer this issue. It's a curious confluence of economics and culture.

That is, it's not the economic model that hurts birth rates. It's the economic effect on culture that does.
You edited it after I had started typing up my post, and I didn't realize it.


As for Japan, it will stabilize. It's honestly way overcrowded, anyways. It will be a little painful getting there, but then the pain is gone, and they don't have to make irreversible changes to their people and culture to do it.

5
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 11:07:26 am »
Ok, so you don't want to kill Muslims to stop terrorism, you want to kill them to preserve a white ethno-state.

Now I guess the next step in the discussion is you complaining when people call you a nazi.
I'm with Sheb on this one. Our brave, brave Sir Robin is so afraid of his imagined threat of genocide that he's willing to endorse actual genocide.
Tell me this.

If whites are not allowed to have an ethnostate, they why does nobody seem to bat an eye at non-white countries trying to preserve their ethnostates?


Quote from: smjjames
Are you implying that drugs and related problems aren't enough? Mexico is basically a failed state run by cartels.



Quote from: Ispil
That's the "popular" argument, but it has issues.
1. It assumes the rate will continue to drop, or at least stay low, forever.
2. It assumes importing new people will solve this problem.

Option 1 doesn't make sense. The biological imperative will never allow that, unless outside forces pressure for it, which would be the aforementioned genocide.
Option 2 also doesn't make sense. If it's the economic model that causes it, then they will suffer the same fate. If the economic model is NOT the primary cause of declining birthrates, then this is forced demographic replacement, and therefor genocide.

6
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 10:49:11 am »
So breed faster :P

Also, that talk about immigrants replacing the natives being equivalent to genocide is the kind of thing white supremacists like to spout. Not neccesarily accusing you of being one lagslayer, I'm just saying be careful with that kind of talk. And for the record, I'm white too.

edit: Also, since you're American, lets use an American example. We have a similar sort of issue, if you will, with hispanics and others, minorities will become the majority by 2050 or so, do you see them inflicting their laws on the natives? No.

edit2: And please point to me where it says in international law that doing this qualifies as genocide.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_Convention#Definition_of_genocide
As for the hispanics, the areas where they are the most numerous have very high levels of crime. While they are not as fanatical as those being brought into Europe, they still bring a considerable chunk of Mexico with them. A hijacking and subsequent change of government policy would be inevitable.

But the numbers just don't add up. I'm not sure what kind of time scale you think this plan has, but if such a plan existed, at current rates it would take centuries for it to actually work. If this was truly an effort to kill off the native population, as you said, there should be a hell of a lot more effort in actually... y'know, killing off the native population. Instead it's 10 people here, 15 there; every time resulting in the arrest or death of the perpetrator. It just makes no sense.
Check the rate of births vs the rate of deaths. It's a game of waiting for the old people to start dying off, then suddenly the entire demographic is flipped on it's head. This could take 2-3 generations to feel the full effect, and you're already feeling huge tremors from the shift.

Also, see the link above.

7
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 07, 2017, 10:21:27 am »
You really gotta admire the courage of people like lagslayer, who are willing to courageously sacrifice the lives of tens of thousands of people they don't know to lower their chance of dying in a terrorist attacks from vanishingly small to vanishingly smaller. I mean, we refuse to face truth, but he's right: it's better to kill a few tens of thousands people today, than to have a handful of people die every year. On the long run, it's the humane thing, we just need to wait a couple millenias, but it's the right thing to do if you arent short-sighted.
You still think this about mere terrorist attacks? Nevermind that they are coming at an ever increasing pace, but this is about something much bigger. They are being brought in explicitly as demographic replacement. And under international law, that qualifies as genocide of the native inhabitants. Long before that even happens, they will constitute an increasing majority of the voting demographic, as the flow of migration never seems to stop, and they breed so rapidly. This means they can force their laws, the laws of the shitholes they came from, on the natives, via the legal system, which will speed up the process even faster.

And their politicians don't even try to hide it anymore, instead just trying to say it's a good thing to kill off all the Europeans.

8
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 11:01:38 pm »
I've been on here way too long as it is, and I'll be leaving for the night. Will check back tomorrow, probably.

9
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 10:38:23 pm »
@Lagslayer: For those who were born in Britian, you can't exactly 'send them the way that they came', not without renouncing their citizenship.
That assumes first generation immigrants. What of second generation and beyond? What if they only have citizenship of the "host" country?

Exactly. Every time the argument 'Lets deport them all to where they came from!' gets used, the fact that you have to deal with the second generation onward comes up every single time, you can't escape that no matter how hard you try.
This is the tricky part. They did not choose to be born here, any more than we chose for them to be born here. Yet, for whatever reason, their way of life is incompatible with ours. There would need to be some sort of repatriation deal with the countries involved, or someone will have to assimilate.


edit: Not that I'm British, because I'm American, but we have similar problems in some places.

10
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 10:28:52 pm »
So... everything is money/capital and hippy culture from the 60s?

Is it merely the timeline you object to, that the things that are tried don't stop the extremists in their tracks immediately, right now, not a second longer?

'Cause, I mean, you just seem to think that genocide will stop things. You mentioned this earlier:

You can't kill an idea with bullets, but you can certainly stop the people who spout it.

You can kill some of the people that spout the message at any one time. We live in a media world, though. Those killings will be reported.

"Why were these people killed?" you might hear.

"They believed the West hates them." will be the retort.

"Perhaps they have a point. What else did they say?"

You can't kill an idea, man.
In my attempt at breivity, I neglected the "send them back where they came, and actually enforcing national sovereignty" option.

see
Here we actually get to the root of the problem- people who feel out of place in a country they call home, being told a siren's song from the lands of their parents of a heritage they might actually recognize. Sure, we could kill the sirens, but these days such songstresses exist across the internet, so we could never get to them all. We could eradicate those who feel disenfranchised, and use it as an example to others who might follow a similar path, but wouldn't that make them feel more like outsiders than before? If they are foreigners due to a lack of shared culture, history, and language, have you considered challenging them on a cultural front? Maybe this whole crisis speaks to a lack of cultural pride and patriotism across your entire nation, which is starting to show in second and third generation immigrants who still feel like foreigners?

Maybe this whole crisis is nothing but a symptom of an even larger one, not fought in the minds of foreigners but all of your countrymen?

How did I miss that?

I agree with what I think you're implying. Different cultures shouldn't just be mashed together, because it just creates friction. And should a small culture find itself isolated within a large culture, this gets even worse. Sometimes, different groups of people are better of being separate from others. This is why nationalism is important. This is why the typical liberal version of "multiculturalism" does not work.

11
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 10:25:23 pm »
You borked your quote attribution.
i know, I know. Already spotted it.

I forgot how cumbersome it is to post on this site.

12
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 10:22:27 pm »
Here we actually get to the root of the problem- people who feel out of place in a country they call home, being told a siren's song from the lands of their parents of a heritage they might actually recognize. Sure, we could kill the sirens, but these days such songstresses exist across the internet, so we could never get to them all. We could eradicate those who feel disenfranchised, and use it as an example to others who might follow a similar path, but wouldn't that make them feel more like outsiders than before? If they are foreigners due to a lack of shared culture, history, and language, have you considered challenging them on a cultural front? Maybe this whole crisis speaks to a lack of cultural pride and patriotism across your entire nation, which is starting to show in second and third generation immigrants who still feel like foreigners?

Maybe this whole crisis is nothing but a symptom of an even larger one, not fought in the minds of foreigners but all of your countrymen?

How did I miss that?

I agree with what I think you're implying. Different cultures shouldn't just be mashed together, because it just creates friction. And should a small culture find itself isolated within a large culture, this gets even worse. Sometimes, different groups of people are better of being separate from others. This is why nationalism is important. This is why the typical liberal version of "multiculturalism" does not work.

13
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 10:11:05 pm »
Can't find your response, unfortunately.

Was it this one?
You're not killing 9 innocents and a murderer, though. You're killing 10 individuals in the fear that one may turn into a murderer.

Additionally, they are your own people. Unless you're going to tell me that they're all foreigners, and you know that's a lie.
Define "foreigner". If someone is technically, legally classified a citizen, but doesn't share any of the culture, history, or even the same language as you, can they really be considered kin? They would be foreigners in everything but name only.


14
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 10:09:00 pm »
Perhaps you can come up with some examples? Everything encompasses a lot of things, after all.
Throwing money at the problem doesn't work. It just gets squandered on something stupid, or whatever it's used for is torn down or neglected because they don't care about it.
Peace and love "Just stop the fighting, maaaaaan! *blunt*" never, EVER worked, because you can't stay hopped up on narcotics 24/7.


These people believe they get into heaven by forcing you to submit to sharia law, killing you, or otherwise wiping you and everything you stand for from history. They only care about your rules to the extent of how they can be turned against you. Where diplomacy and resources do not matter, all that is left is violence or surrender.

15
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 06, 2017, 09:50:49 pm »
Are you going to start quoting Harry Potter now?
I don't recall anything useful in such a derivative work.  Wouldn't you like some Pratchett, instead?
I'd love to if only I had the time. barely enough hours in a day to work, sleep, eat, keep up with current events, and browse dank memes.


No, no, that was me clarifying your point. I'm talking about the post where I made my own, which was right before that.

As for "who is on the side of facts and who of emotion", it doesn't matter, because rhetoric isn't one side versus another. The strongest argument will fall if it stands on but a single rhetorical leg, when put up against a balanced argument. Problem is that we don't actually teach rhetoric anymore, so no one knows how to construct a proper one.
I believe I did respond to that post. Perhaps it was overlooked? Or do you feel it didn't address your point?

As for the rhetorical leg thing, that's what I was talking about when I mentioned illegal opinions, earlier.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 283