Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 180 181 [182] 183 184 ... 194

Author Topic: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]  (Read 187789 times)

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2715 on: January 29, 2011, 06:53:56 pm »

Well... if you're going to try and keep your children in line with threat of death and torture after death, have you really given them independance?
Logged

Shambling Zombie

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2716 on: January 29, 2011, 07:27:15 pm »

I'm not trying to say God is evil. I'd have to believe in God to say that, and if He does exist, I don't believe he is evil. Not benevolent, but not evil either.
Logged

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2717 on: January 29, 2011, 07:30:16 pm »

I'm not trying to say God is evil. I'd have to believe in God to say that, and if He does exist, I don't believe he is evil. Not benevolent, but not evil either.
Well that is silly reasoning.
Interesting fact: Sherlock Homes was an opium addict. Does that imply he existed? If we can apply 'good' and 'bad', both very abstract qualitys, to something equaly as abstract as say, legislation, then surly we can apply it to a diety who may or may not exist.

Shambling Zombie

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2718 on: January 29, 2011, 07:35:01 pm »

Fair point.
Logged

Siquo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Procedurally generated
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2719 on: January 29, 2011, 07:44:54 pm »

In that case he's as good as his reasons coincide with yours (as that's the definition of "absolute good"). Because his reasons are generally not known (lots of disagreement there), it's quite impossible to label him good or bad.
Logged

This one thread is mine. MIIIIINE!!! And it will remain a happy, friendly, encouraging place, whether you lot like it or not. 
will rena,eme sique to sique sxds-- siquo if sucessufil
(cant spel siqou a. every speling looks wroing (hate this))

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2720 on: January 29, 2011, 07:51:45 pm »

Well, if we're talking about God as a character who appeared in the bible (real or not) then we are usually told his reasons.
Logged

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2721 on: January 29, 2011, 07:54:50 pm »

Reason: People are sinners.
Action: Water them down a little.
Moral compication: God feels bad about the floating bodys.
Resolution: The rainbow!

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2722 on: January 29, 2011, 07:56:44 pm »

Reason: People are sinners.
Action: Water them down a little.
Moral compication: God feels bad about the floating bodies.
Resolution: The rainbow!
MetalSlimeHunt's Analysis: Lawful Evil
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Siquo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Procedurally generated
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2723 on: January 29, 2011, 07:58:05 pm »

Reason: People are sinners.
Action: Water them down a little.
Moral compication: God feels bad about the floating bodys.
Resolution: The rainbow!
And we've never been that bad ever since, so it worked. Now what?
Logged

This one thread is mine. MIIIIINE!!! And it will remain a happy, friendly, encouraging place, whether you lot like it or not. 
will rena,eme sique to sique sxds-- siquo if sucessufil
(cant spel siqou a. every speling looks wroing (hate this))

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2724 on: January 29, 2011, 07:59:33 pm »

And we've never been that bad ever since, so it worked.
Uh... really?
Logged

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2725 on: January 29, 2011, 08:03:49 pm »

MetalSlimeHunt's Analysis: Lawful Evil
Realy? Because I got lawful good from that. I mean have you ever see lawful good? It is mistakable for evil.

And we've never been that bad ever since, so it worked. Now what?
Objection!

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2726 on: January 29, 2011, 08:14:03 pm »

MetalSlimeHunt's Analysis: Lawful Evil
Realy? Because I got lawful good from that. I mean have you ever see lawful good? It is mistakable for evil.
Quote
Generally, killing almost everything on Earth is considered evil. God did it because we broke his rules enough, and thus the action is lawful.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2727 on: January 29, 2011, 08:18:49 pm »

MetalSlimeHunt's Analysis: Lawful Evil
Realy? Because I got lawful good from that. I mean have you ever see lawful good? It is mistakable for evil.
Quote
Generally, killing almost everything on Earth is considered evil. God did it because we broke his rules enough, and thus the action is lawful.
See, it is lawful, so were going along the 'good to evil' axis now.
But, god felt regret, showing killing the people wasn't something he realy wanted to do, showing good. Therefor, lawful good!
And I mean realy, has there ever been a lawful good character that hasn't had to deal with some struggle between lawful and good? It's the biggest running theme in alignments! Every other alignment has their shit together.

And that is why I am chaotic nutural.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2728 on: January 29, 2011, 08:22:01 pm »

But, god felt regret, showing killing the people wasn't something he realy wanted to do, showing good. Therefor, lawful good!
"So yeah, so sorry I decided to kill everything on Earth there. Here, have a rainbow."
I'm not really buying that for a second. Lawful Evil.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Askot Bokbondeler

  • Bay Watcher
  • please line up orderly
    • View Profile
Re: Atheism Redux [READ THE FIRST POST]
« Reply #2729 on: January 29, 2011, 08:25:03 pm »

neutural.

But, god felt regret, showing killing the people wasn't something he realy wanted to do, showing good. Therefor, lawful good!
"So yeah, so sorry I decided to kill everything on Earth there. Here, have a rainbow."
I'm not really buying that for a second. Lawful Evil.

nah, god is lawfull good, but also a minmaxer who chose intelligence and wisdom as dumpstats
Pages: 1 ... 180 181 [182] 183 184 ... 194